I miss the good old days.
I had a land line and an email address. I’d get calls to my house and if I missed them, people would leave a message on my answering machine. When I got home, I’d listen to the messages and call people back. (Let me interject that I would return communication in the same mode as it was requested – ie., if I was called, I’d call back.) It was very clear, cut, and dry.
Now, not so much.
I have a cell phone, maybe a work phone, an email, a work email, you can text me, ping me, tweet at me, DM me, Facebook me, Gchat me, IM me, god forbid even FAX me. When I go to return the communication, I can use any of the aforementioned methods and it doesn’t matter which was used first. My friend Tom O’Keefe (@BostonTweet) is notorious for this. I @reply him, he calls me. I email him, he DMs me. I text him, he faxes me an answer. I make fun of him that he does it on purpose. But I don’t think he does. It’s just part of life now.
So this is my question to you.
When I talk about people like Chris Brogan, do I link to Chris’ Twitter account or his website? Ultimately, I venture to say website, where that is where I would think traffic is most valued. However, the same case could be said for linking to someone’s Twitter page – driving traffic to where you can contact the person in the easiest, most raw fashion.
I’m baffled. What are your thoughts?
Photo via metrognome0





Fri, Sep 11, 2009
Digital Anthropology, Philosophy, Tech